Low Salmon Stocks: Pacific Salmon Wars

July 24, 2006 at 4:47 pm

I remember being a university student in BC in the early 90’s and hearing an incredible lecture by a Pacific Salmon expert. I will never forget when he got up and drew a map of the West Coast from Alaska down to Oregon. He then proceeded to draw the migratory routes of major salmon stocks from Alaska/BC/Washington and Oregon and the many “inteceptions” along the way. “Interceptions” means ...

Because salmon intermingle across political jurisdictions during their migrations, it is impossible for fishermen to separate them by nation of origin. Hence, it is inevitable that fish originating from Canadian streams will be caught in U.S. fisheries, and that U.S. fish will be caught by Canadians. These catches are called “interceptions.”

He went on to talk about allocations, politics, transboundary issues etc,,. I remember at the end of the lecture thinking that these poor salmon are getting “hammered” along the way and don’t have much of a chance.

Now I live in the north and I feel much more connected to salmon and their journey (see Wolf Creek Release and Fish Ladder). I have been following the progress of a number of our salmon stocks, in the Yukon River and the Alsek Tatshenshini watersheds. So far, the runs are late and look really poor. I will be keeping an eye on this as I hope that many of you will. I have attached a few links for the Yukon Salmon Committee and an overview paper on the Pacific Salmon Wars

If any of you have strong thoughts on this issue, I would be interested in hearing them. I still want to do some more research before coming out with my thoughts…but I do NOT think that it is the recreational or sports fishing industry that is most cause for concern here.

6 comments so far

I think salmon are doomed, victims of two unfortunate sets of circumstances:

1) A textbook tragedy of the commons. Each individual recieves full benefit for every extra fish they take, but the cost is shared by everybody. So, the rational choice for an individual is to take those additional fish. Everybody does it, and the resource is over-fished.

2) Politics and competition between Americans and Canadians, aboriginals and non-aboriginals, and between commercial, subsistence and recreational fisheries. Nobody wants to be told what to do, and everybody believes they are entitled to the resource.

I hate thinking about stuff like this, it makes me angry. Maybe thats why Ive never fished for salmon in Yukon.

Anthony on July 25, 2006 at 6:39 am

I thought you would have some thoughts on this one Anthony. I also have trouble fishing for salmon in the Yukon. I cant speak on the Dawson Yukon River Chinook fishery becuase I have no experience with it, however, for the Alsek Tatshenshini salmon, I just feel like those salmon have worked so hard to get there that I could not possibly harvest them at this point. Oddly enough, I dont seem to have such an ethical problem when they are fresh from the ocean.

I also worry that besides the potential negative effects like sea lice on wild stock, the influence of fish farming placates mainstream consumers into thinking there are no issues with salmon stocks. While wild stocks are in decline, there is still an abundance of farmed fish showing up in stores and restaurants. Consumers are less likely to care about the plight of wild salmon.

Dennis Zimmermann on July 25, 2006 at 11:23 am

Gone are the days when one could fish for Salmon in the Yukon.

At least from my perspective.

There are a few die hard roe fishers that still go to Village Creek and Tatchun Creek with success. Flies? Forget it

Yes, statistically, the numbers show they are doomed.

I still clutch to glorious memories of Dalton Post King fishing pre-washout.

My thoughts?

Ecologically, climate change has effected natural breeding grounds with washouts being experienced almost everywhere. High, dirty water are the words off of everyones mouths when talking about local tributaries.

And…here we go.

Yes, the race is on to net as much as they can before they even hit the tributaries. Even worse, the discrepencies between aboriginal and non-aboriginal regulations, or should I say the lack thereof. Harpers on the right track by tackling this hot potato issue.

And he better soon, before it really is too late for the Pacific Salmon fishery.

Hot Potato on July 25, 2006 at 1:56 pm

Hot Potato:

I have been in the north going on 10 years now and have been fishing Salmon in Haines for about nine. Even in my short span here I agree with the high, dirty water theory as a result of climate change. It seems it was different even five years ago. The water coming off rivers like the Chilkat were clear more frequently.

To change the subject a bit, another thing that pisses me off is when some recreational/sport anglers resort to snagging fish when the water gets dirty. I have seen this numerous times in recent years on the Chilkat when anglers know the Coho cant see the lures to take it. At some point, usually the mid-point of the trip when they fear the freezer will sit empty, the psychology changes and snagging become acceptable (although still illegal). I have witnessed groups of anglers on a river fight a Coho, pulling them in by dorsal, tail, belly, etc.. coming in sideways. All it would take is a conservation officer to #1 witness it or #2 to have a look at the catch with not a mark on its mouth but a big hook gash on its belly. Another rant…why have I fished in Haines for nine years, sometimes three-four times a year and my license or catch has never been checked!

Dennis Zimmermann on July 25, 2006 at 6:49 pm

You helped lead me down the path of one of the biggest discrepencies, and thats regulation between Canadian and American jurisdictions.

Respectfully, one need only look no further than retention limits. 6 daily, quite frankly, is far too high. Compare that to 2 on the Canadian side (sockeye).

COs?

License is constantly checked by friendly Canadian officers on this side.

Haines? Never.

Ill never forget the time I was at Tatchun the weekend DFO set up cameras in the bushes and busted almost everyone who fished there that weekend (I think the number was up in the mid 20s), except me and my father.

We too, pride ourselves on ethical fishing.

Keep up the good work.

HP on July 25, 2006 at 8:25 pm

Id highly recommend a book I just finished called The Thousand Year Run. It is written by a geophysicist who has specialized in river geomorphology of the Pacific Northwest. It was through this perspective that he initially became interested in the plight of Pacific Salmon. But the book actually starts with providing a historical perspective on what happened to salmon stocks in Europe hundreds of years ago, then on the east coast of N. America, and what is happening now in the Northwest. Not surprisingly, in every one of these cases, the same factors have been ignored and history repeated. What is happening in the Pacific Northwest is nothing new, and there is no more research that needs to be done to better understand how to conserve wild salmon. They understood what salmon needed to remain healthy 500 years ago in Europe (and passed conservation laws accordingly - which were undermined, ignored and poorly enforced, just as they are today), and obviously First Nations cultures have understood all along what salmon require.

It isnt just overharvesting through commercial fishing - its also habitat degradation through polution and irresponsible logging practices, habitat alteration through dredging and straightening stream beds, and dams which have disregarded proper avenues for fish passage, many of which are dams that arent really even needed anymore, but are stubbornly clung to by industry interests who arent willing to adapt. In addition, the fisheries approach of thinking its possible to overcome having to change any of the factors outlined above by simply pumping out millions of hatchery salmon has turned into a huge waste of money with little difference in return rates.

The bottom line is - we know what needs to happen, but just as salmon dont limit themselves to particular countries, they also dont conform to the way we divide our management of all the various factors that are involved in keeping them healthy, and getting all of these different agencies and interests, and their greedy agendas, to agree has proved insurmountable. I think that only be reorganizing how we manage salmon habitat - by taking a unified watershed approach, where one agency oversees protection of all of these factors, with the real authority to do so, will anything change.

Bruce on July 28, 2006 at 6:16 am

Post a comment

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Preview of comment